Supreme Court of Connecticut· 9/7/2010
Maltas v. Maltas
Citations
- 2 A.3d 902
- 298 Conn. 354
- 2010 Conn. LEXIS 305
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Although adequate service of process is necessary for a state to obtain jurisdiction over an out-of-state party, it is not sufficient.”
- “Because a valid judgment from a sister state is entitled to full faith and credit in Connecticut, the only issue before the trial court was whether” the judgment was not void for lack of jurisdiction.
- court’s function to decide whether issues of material fact exist
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, McLachlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.