Skip to main content
· 3/17/1911

Malsch v. Waggoner

Citations

  • 62 Wash. 470
  • 114 P. 446
  • 1911 Wash. LEXIS 727

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Review—Harmless Error — Evidence. The erroneous admission of a deed which was no.evidence of legal title is harmless, where the court found on other evidence that the grantee was the owner of the premises.</p> <p>Easements — Prescription—Permissive Use. Permissive use for twenty years of a private way across plaintiff’s land to a .county road does not establish an easement, where there was another practical route, plaintiffs predecessors having sold to defendant’s predr ecessors a strip of land for the express purpose of giving access to the county road.</p> <p>Easements — Implied' Grants — “Appurtenances.” The grant of land with the “appurtenances” does not infer the grant of a right of way leading to the land over an existing road, where there was no existing easement.</p>

Judges: Crow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.