Skip to main content
· 5/20/1997

Malpass v. Rodgers (In Re Music Merchants, Inc.)

Citations

  • 208 B.R. 944
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4555
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 8600
  • 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 758
  • 30 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that enhancement of attorney’s fee is not required simply by the fact that there has been a delay in receipt of payment although it is a permissible factor to consider
  • stating there is “no authority for the proposition that awarded fees must be adjusted for delay in payment”
  • stating there is \no authority for the proposition that awarded fees must be adjusted for delay in payment\
  • affirming 17 bankruptcy court’s reduction in hourly rate where senior attorney performed work 18 more appropriately performed by a lower-paid professional, such as a paralegal or 19 junior associate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yolinn, Volinn, Ollason, Hagan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.