Skip to main content
· 10/8/2004

Maloney v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 99 P.3d 565
  • 2004 Alas. LEXIS 121
  • 2004 WL 2260298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding offer was for policy limits even without Rule 82 attorney's fees component because litigant was unrepresented at time of offer
  • \Our cases uniformly hold that unrepresented litigants have no right to recover attorney's fees under Rule 82 (unless they are attorneys themselves).\
  • “Our cases uniformly hold that unrepresented litigants have no right to recover attorney’s fees under Rule 82 (unless they are attorneys themselves).” (first citing Shearer, 36 P.3d at 1198; then citing J.L.P. v. V.L.A., 30 P.3d 590, 599 (Alaska 2001

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.