Maloney v. Madrid Motor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the letter, stating “… we do not wish to continue this agreement, in the future, when it expires next September,” gave clear notice of intent to terminate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-30· cited 141×
• Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Prospect Communications, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-07-14· cited 83×
• Lombardo v. Gasparini Excavating Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-06-25· cited 78×
• Stovall v. Publishers Paper Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-10-10· cited 20×
• Petralex Stainless, Ltd. v. Bishop Tube Division of Christiana Metals (In Re Petralex Stainless, Ltd.)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-10-15· cited 20×
• Weilersbacher v. Pittsburgh Brewing Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-04-19· cited 19×
• Efco Importers v. Halsobrunn
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-10-22· cited 16×
• Morris Silverman Management Corp. v. Western Union Financial Services, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2003-06-19· cited 15×
• Eastern Milk Producers Co-Op. Association, Inc. v. Lehigh Valley Co-Op., Farmers
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-08-18· cited 7×
• Bahoric v. St. Lawrence Croation, No. 13
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-06-30· cited 6×
• Hyperlogistics Group, Inc. v. Kraton Polymers U.S. LLC
  S.D. Ohio· 2006-07-11

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cummings v. Kelling Nut Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-11-13· cited 61×
• Harris v. DeFelice
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-11-15· cited 29×
• Wright v. Bristol Patent Leather Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-04-16· cited 25×
• Jones v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1928-11-26· cited 20×