Malone v. Payeur (In Re Payeur)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “responsibility for presenting an adequate record on appeal rests squarely with the appellant”
• finding that appellant did not meet burden of proving bankruptcy court’s finding was clearly erroneous where record did not contain transcript of hearing
• “As it is Appellant’s duty to arrange for this panel to have an adequate record on which to consider its argument, we conclude that Appellant has not met its burden of proving that the bankruptcy judge’s finding ... was clearly erroneous.”
• “As it is Appellant's duty to arrange for this panel to have an adequate record on which to consider its argument, we conclude that Appellant has not met its burden of proving that the bankruptcy judge's finding ... was clearly erroneous.”
• applying former Bankruptcy Rule 806 and former FRAP 7
• “As it is Appellant’s duty to arrange for this panel to have an adequate record on which to consider its argument, we conclude that Appellant has not met its burden of proving that the bankruptcy judge’s finding . . . was clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).