Malone v. Oklahoma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the loss of First Amendment freedoms “unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury”
• finding antitrust claim based on defendant newspaper’s latest refusal to carry inserts printed by plaintiff collaterally estopped by decision upholding defendant’s prior refusal to carry plaintiff’s insert on the same grounds
• “We cannot conclude that [the Puerto Rico Department of Consumer Affairs] has a legitimate state interest in fixing a problem it has not shown to exist.”
• applying Elrod to irreparable harm component of permanent injunction analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).