Malone v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding deposition on file with trial court not sufficient to make proper bill of exception; citing McInnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., 673 S.W.2d 185, 187 (Tex.1984)
• holding a statement made a day after the exciting event “could not have been a spontaneous reaction”
• explaining that appellant waives error by not challenging all possible grounds for trial court’s ruling to exclude evidence
• holding Texas does not recognize intentional spoliation tort
• holding Texas does not recognize intentional spoliation tort
• “To complain on appeal that the trial court erroneously excluded evidence, the appellant must show he attempted to introduce the evidence and obtained an adverse ruling from the judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).