Malone v. AMEREN UE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that discovery concerning the settlement agreement was not warranted” where the proposed discovery had “limited probative value” and risked “compromis[ing] the confidentiality of the settlement”
• finding a few occurrences over a course of years was not sufficiently severe or pervasive to establish a hostile work environment
• affirming district court’s exclusion of affidavits where the opposing party had “no opportunity to depose the witnesses”
• affirming grant of summary judgment in Title VII case where three of the four incidents plaintiff cited were not directed to him
• affirming summary judgment where some of the incidents were not directed at the plaintiff and others occurred outside of the plaintiff’s presence
• considering whether the administrative complaint is sufficient to give the employer notice of the subject matter of the charge and identify generally the basis for a claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).