Skip to main content
· 5/15/1969

Malo v. Anderson

Citations

  • 454 P.2d 828
  • 76 Wash. 2d 1
  • 1969 Wash. LEXIS 611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if appellant's knowledge of pending appeal prevented her doing anything with the property except at her own risk, the appeal itself would act as a supersedeas; no prevailing party would expend any money on property awarded in an unsuperseded judgment for fear of losing the investment.
  • If appellant’s knowledge of pending appeal prevented her doing anything with the property except at her own risk, the appeal itself would act as a supersedeas; no prevailing party would expend any money on property awarded in an unsuperseded judgment for fear of losing the investment.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.