· 5/15/1969
Malo v. Anderson
Citations
- 454 P.2d 828
- 76 Wash. 2d 1
- 1969 Wash. LEXIS 611
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- if appellant's knowledge of pending appeal prevented her doing anything with the property except at her own risk, the appeal itself would act as a supersedeas; no prevailing party would expend any money on property awarded in an unsuperseded judgment for fear of losing the investment.
- If appellant’s knowledge of pending appeal prevented her doing anything with the property except at her own risk, the appeal itself would act as a supersedeas; no prevailing party would expend any money on property awarded in an unsuperseded judgment for fear of losing the investment.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cole
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.