Malnar v. Whitfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implying that injunction might be available if money remedy inadequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. Kreikemeier
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2010-04-16· cited 342×
• Holaday v. Seay (In Re Seay)
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-12-16· cited 52×
• A+ Welding & Construction, Inc. v. Brichacek
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1997-02-10· cited 2×
• Opinion No. (1997)
  Oklahoma Attorney General Reports· 1997-05-05

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Allied Materials Corporation v. Superior Products Company, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1980-04-17· cited 87×
• Marley v. Cannon
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1980-10-07· cited 82×
• Carpenter v. Carpenter
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1982-03-16· cited 74×
• Story v. Hefner
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1975-07-22· cited 67×
• Peters v. Golden Oil Co.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1979-09-11· cited 61×
• Davon Drilling Company v. Ginder
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1970-03-24· cited 47×
• Fairlawn Cemetery Ass'n v. First Presbyterian Church, U. S. A. of Oklahoma City
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1972-04-25· cited 31×
• Whillock v. Whillock
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1976-04-20· cited 17×
• Folk v. Wallace Business Forms, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 1968-04-16· cited 17×
• Ex Parte Hibler
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1929-10-05· cited 13×
• Malnar v. Whitfield
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1985-10-08· cited 10×
• Smith v. Bovaird Supply Co.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1980-09-09· cited 9×
• Ex Parte Thompson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1951-09-19· cited 8×
• Bates v. Utech
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1967-12-26· cited 6×