· 9/7/1988
Malloy v. Lee County
Citations
- 694 F. Supp. 851
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10211
- 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,583
- 48 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 532
- 1988 WL 94051
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “the right to retain counsel in civil litigation is implicit in the concept of fifth amendment due process”
- explaining a litigant “requires the guiding hand of counsel at every step in the proceedings”
- explaining a litigant “requires the guiding hand of counsel at every step in the proceedings”
- “Historically and in practice, the right to a hearing has always included the right to the aid of counsel when desired and provided by the party asserting the right.”
- where plaintiff’s lead counsel was representing judge at the time of trial in personal, unrelated, matters and the judge’s father was a member of plaintiff’s counsel’s law firm, recusal was required
- “[W]hen a partner in a law firm is related to a judge within the third degree, that partner will always be known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of a proceeding involving the partner’s law firm”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kovachevich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.