Mallon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A rule 3.800(a) motion is the proper vehicle to address a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement of a sentence and the written order of sentence.”
• “On remand, the trial court shall determine whether the written sentence conforms to the oral pronouncement. If they do, the trial court shall attach written portions of the record conclusively refuting Mallon’s claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Michael W. Nelson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-28
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-03-27

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Berthiaume v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-30· cited 11×
• England v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-06· cited 4×
• Mallon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-03· cited 1×