Mallitz v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Petitioner] is required to make an objective showing that without a Rule 27 hearing, known testimony would otherwise be lost, Court No. 16-1001 Page 4 concealed, or destroyed.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).