Malletier v. Veit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding the statutory maximum damages of $100,000 based upon nature of defendant’s conduct, including defendant’s bad faith
• finding statutory maximum was warranted 6 where defendants committed “egregious acts in blatantly using Plaintiff Louis 7 Vuitton’s registered trademark to sell counterfeit Louis Vuitton products”
• awarding a total of $1,000,000 for defendant's infringement of six Louis Vuitton marks
• domain name louisvuitton-replicas.com constitutes an identical or confusingly similar use of the Louis Vuitton mark
• “Willfulness can be inferred by the fact that a defendant continued infringing behavior after being given notice.”
• “Willfulness can be inferred by the fact that a defendant continued infringing behavior after being given notice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).