Mallard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \we can reasonably infer that our General Assembly considered the heightened risk to a confined victim if the perpetrator is armed with a deadly weapon when it determined that a Class B felony enhancement was warranted in such cases\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nicoson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2010-12-15· cited 60×
• Nicoson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-01-20· cited 3×
• Arcine Cook v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-04-13
• Russell Rouzier v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-09-22
• Jimmy Lee Bush v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-11-17
• Tyrone Dewayne Bradshaw v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2024-07-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cox v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-09-17· cited 82×
• Armour v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-02-05· cited 33×
• Rogers v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-05-03· cited 15×
• Griesinger v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-07-28· cited 11×
• Grafe v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-10-21· cited 10×
• Dobbs v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-04-15· cited 4×