Malkit Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting omission of facts in initial testimony as basis for adverse credibility finding where subsequent, more detailed testimony was not apparently inconsistent with the initial testimony, and where the BIA did not explain why the two were inconsistent
• “Contrary to our precedent, the BIA did not explain why this omission, assuming one exists, is significant or goes to the heart of Singh’s asylum claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).