Skip to main content
· 5/29/1981

Malini v. Singleton & Associates

Citations

  • 516 F. Supp. 440
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • argument that number of patients is static and that doctor’s addition to staff would not effect hospital’s purchase of supplies not meritorious.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cire

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.