Maliner-Colvin v. 85-10 34th Avenue Apartment Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court did not err in sentencing when it considered portions of the defendant’s presentence investigation report describing conduct for which the defendant was acquitted
• concluding no abuse of discretion for failing to redline information related to prior conduct for which defendant was acquitted given requirements of Rule 32 in relation to contents of PSI
• “The question of whether evidence is relevant is reviewed de novo, while the decision to admit relevant evidence is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).