Malina v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]ismissal of class allegations at the pleading 19 stage should be done rarely and . . . the better course is to deny such a motion because the 20 shape and form of a class action evolves only through the process of discovery.”
• “[I]t is the responsibility of the plaintiff, not the court, to identify with particularity the evidentiary facts existing in the record which can oppose the defendant's summary judgment motion. The court ... is not required to independently comb the record to look for them.”
• “[I]t is the responsibility of the plaintiff, not the court, to identify with particularity the evidentiary facts existing in the record which can oppose the defendant’s summary judgment motion. The court . . . is not required to independently comb the record to look for them.”
• “[I]t is the responsibility of the plaintiff, not the court, to identify with particularity the evidentiary facts existing in the record which can oppose the defendant’s summary judgment motion. The court . . . is not required to independently comb the record to look for them.”
• “[I]t is the responsibility of the plaintiff, not the court, to identity with particularity the evidentiary facts existing in the record which can oppose the defendant’s summary judgment motion. The court . . . is not required to independently comb the record to look for them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).