Malik v. FALCON HOLDINGS, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f defendants thought that plaintiffs had failed to perform their obligations under the rules, they should have asked the district judge for a sanction before discovery closed rather than waiting (as they did) until their motion for summary judgment.”
• considering prejudice to party seeking sanctions
• considering prejudice to party seeking sanctions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Randolph v. PowerComm Construction, Inc.
  D. Maryland· 2015-08-21· cited 23×
• Paloian v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n (In re Doctors Hospital of Hyde Park, Inc.)
  N.D. Illinois· 2013-10-04· cited 15×
• Gecker v. Flynn (In re Emerald Casino, Inc.)
  N.D. Illinois· 2015-07-14· cited 3×
• Johnson v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2012-11-07· cited 3×
• Lauth v. Covance, Inc.
  S.D. Indiana· 2016-06-14· cited 1×
• United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. All Know Holdings, Ltd.
  N.D. Illinois· 2013-06-10· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mark A. Ball v. City of Chicago and Alfred S. Schultz, Individually and as Agent of the City of Chicago
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-09-16· cited 265×
• ATA Airlines, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-12-27· cited 24×
• Kelly Brines, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Xtra Corp.
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-09-10· cited 16×