Malik Abdull Jemerson v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 85, 86, completely preempts state-law usury claims against national banks
• concluding that §§85 and 86 of the National Banking Act completely preempt state law claims of usury against national banks
• holding that removal is proper based on complete preemption only when Congress intended the federal cause of action to be exclusive
• holding that the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 85, 86, completely preempts state-law usury claims against national banks
• holding that the Price-Anderson Act “expressly provides for removal of such actions brought in state court even when they assert only state-law claims”
• recognizing that “[a]s a general rule, absent diversity jurisdiction, a case will not be removable if the complaint does not affirmatively allege a federal claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).