Malen v. MTD Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a jury could find that the design was defective where the alternative was. the defendant’s very own design, was conceived before the product that caused the plaintiffs injuries was built, and was incorporated into later product models

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).