Skip to main content
U.S. Tax Court· 6/9/1981

Malekzad v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 76 T.C. 963
  • 1981 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding the validity of an earlier version of section 301.7502-1(c)(1)(iii)(B)(3), Proced. & -8- [ ] Admin. Regs.,5 and concluding that a USPS postmark trumps a private postage meter mark as the latter is disregarded pursuant to the operative regulation
  • upholding the validity of an earlier version of section 301.7502-1(c)(1)(iii)(B)(3) , Proced. & Admin. Regs., 4 and concluding that a U.S. Postal Service postmark trumps a private postage meter mark as the latter is disregarded pursuant to the operative regulation
  • “[T]o come within the terms of section 7502, the petition must have been timely mailed on or before the last date for filing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.