Malek v. Martin Marietta Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]t is the plaintiff’s personal knowledge, and not his beliefs . . . or speculation, that are admissible at trial and the proper subject of any affidavit”
• ADA case indicating that discriminatory discharge and discriminatory failure to recall state separate claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).