Maldonado v. Lewis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Chabad asserted jurisdiction over Russia “without separate discussion” of the foreign state
• explaining that “[a]bsent such an exception, the 17 immunity conferred by the FSIA strips courts of both subject matter and personal 18 jurisdiction over the foreign state”
• stating alter ego may be shown by either extensive control \or ... fraud or injustice\
• affirming denial of jurisdictional discovery where “plaintiffs did not specify . . . what discovery they might seek”
• affirming denial of discovery where “plaintiffs did not specify—and on appeal still have not specified—what discovery they might seek”
• applying presumption of separation to subsidies controlled by a government instrumentality under the FSIA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).