Malbrough v. Crown Equipment Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, on interlocutory appeal, that expert testimony not always required by the terms of the Louisiana Product Liability Act to prove pri-ma facie design defect
• refusing to assess an asserted genuine issue of material fact because such “is not a question of law within the meaning of § 1292(b)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Guy v. Crown Equipment Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 2004-12-15· cited 408×
• In Re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-12-29· cited 123×
• Castellanos-Contreras v. Decatur Hotels, LLC
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-10-04· cited 74×
• Withhart v. Otto Candies, L.L.C
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-12-20· cited 69×
• Ingrid Fisher v. Halliburton
  Fifth Circuit· 2012-01-12· cited 68×
• Morgan McMillan v. Amazon.com, Incorporated
  Fifth Circuit· 2020-12-18· cited 36×
• Tanks v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-07-14· cited 24×
• Louisiana Patients' Compensation Fund Oversight Board v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-06-07· cited 16×
• Easom v. US Well Services
  Fifth Circuit· 2022-06-15· cited 12×
• Fisher v. Halliburton
  S.D. Texas· 2010-03-25· cited 8×
• Tanks Ex Rel. Estate of Willis v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-07-28· cited 2×
• Rich v. Ball Ranch Partnership
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 1×
• Silverthorne v. Sterling Seismic
  Fifth Circuit· 2025-01-03

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• James R. Ahrenholz, Plaintiff-Appellee/respondent v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Defendant-Appellant/petitioner
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-07-18· cited 355×
• Kenneth Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-08-29· cited 262×