Malave v. Sullivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, to the extent the ALJ’s decision was based on a misreading of the evidence, the decision was “not supported by substantial evidence in the record”
• “It is clear from the rest of the ALJ’s opinion that he misunderstood the ‘facts known here,’ since, as noted above, the ALJ mistakenly stated that the ‘claimant did not have a condition likely to cause pain (at least there was no evidence of it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).