Malandrino v. Board of Elections of Westchester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that offenses constitute crimes involving moral turpitude because offenses included an element of fraud
• holding that the taking of cash is assumed to be permanent
• holding that the taking of cash is assumed to be permanent
• holding that the taking of cash is assumed to be permanent
• involving a Canadian statute stating that “[e]very one commits theft who fraudulently and without colour of right takes, or fraudulently and without colour of right converts” the property of another (em phases added)
• finding theft involves moral turpitude when a permanent taking is intended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).