· 5/21/1951
Malamed v. Sedelsky
Citations
- 367 Pa. 353
- 80 A.2d 853
- 1951 Pa. LEXIS 394
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- barring priority of judgment lien creditor because of constructive notice of unrecorded deed inferred from /possession by such deed’s grantee
- couple placed home in brother's name to obtain a Veterans' Administration loan
- “Excusive possession . . . was sufficient constructive notice.”
- “It is the duty of a purchaser of real property to make inquiry respecting the rights of the party in possession and failing to do so they are affected with constructive notice of such facts as would have come to his knowledge in the proper discharge of that duty.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stern, Stearns, Jones, Bell, Ladner, Chidsey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.