Skip to main content
· 8/16/2010

Malack v. BDO Seidman, LLP

Citations

  • 617 F.3d 743
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17090
  • 2010 WL 3211088

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that each element of a legal claim is relevant to assessing predominance
  • “An abuse of discretion occurs if the district court’s decision rests upon . . . an improper application of law to fact.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Fisher, Greenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.