Makris v. Sugarman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the protective sweep search is limited to “ensure the safety of arresting officers”
• holding appellate court bound by trial court’s finding of facts supported by record and conducting de novo review of legal conclusions drawn therefrom
• rejecting argument by Commonwealth that suppression of evidence seized from juvenile probationer need not be suppressed because subsection 6304(a.1)(3
• warrantless search of probationer’s bedroom must be supported by a reasonable suspicion that the probationer was in violation of his supervision conditions
• Pennsylvania Supreme Court found, after Samson, that state law proscribes suspicionless search of juvenile probationers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).