Makila Land Co. v. Kapu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that removal under § 1441 “is strictly construed against removal, with all doubts resolved in favor of remand in recognition of the interests of comity with state court jurisdiction” (quotation omitted)
• agreeing with district court that defendants abandoned basis of removal due to “insufficient briefing” at the lower court and “thin” arguments at the appellate level on this issue
• agreeing with district court that defendants abandoned basis of removal due to “insufficient briefing” at the lower court and “thin” arguments at the appellate level on this issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).