Maki v. Scherzer

Citations

• 2026 Ohio 385

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law were not court's judgment, so appellant filed motion for new trial more than 28 days after court issued its judgment, making new trial motion untimely, which did not toll time for filing notice of appeal under App.R. 4(B). Because notice of appeal was untimely as to trial judgment, appeals court lacks jurisdiction to review trial judgment. Trial court properly denied motion for new trial as untimely.