Skip to main content
· 4/20/1918

Makainai v. Lalakea

Citations

  • 24 Haw. 268
  • 1918 Haw. LEXIS 49

Syllabus

<p>Fraud — pleading.</p> <p>In alleging fraud tbe rules of good pleading require that tbe inculpatory facts be specifically alleged so that tbe pleading on its face discloses tbe mode in which the fraud was accomplished.</p> <p>Equity — jurisdiction</p> <p>The several circuit judges may exercise their equity jurisdiction when and only when the party has no plain, adequate and complete remedy at law.</p> <p>Same — same—void deed — accounting.</p> <p>While ejectment is the proper remedy to recover land from one holding under a void deed, equity will entertain jurisdiction where the plaintiff cannot obtain complete relief at law and alleges facts showing that he is entitled to a discovery and accounting for rents of the land in controversy.</p> <p>Same — pleading—discovery.</p> <p>A bill for relief upon the ground of discovery must aver that the facts sought to be discovered are material to the cause of action; that the party has no means of proving them in a court of law and that the discovery of them by respondent is indispensable as proof.</p> <p>Same — same—accounting.</p> <p>Equity will relieve where the bill discloses that there is an account between the parties which cannot be conveniently and properly adjusted and settled in an action at law.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that nonprecedential authorities may be \relied upon . . . for any persuasiveness or reasoning [they] contain[]\
  • holding that the benefit of doubt rule does not apply in determining the facts upon which the Court’s jurisdiction is based
  • holding that the Court is bound by its own panel decisions as well as decisions of the Federal Circuit
  • recognizing that a nonprecedential authority may be \relied upon . . . for any persuasiveness or reasoning it contains\
  • holding that the Court is bound by panel or en banc decisions of this Court, decisions of the Federal Circuit, or decisions of the Supreme Court
  • holding that appellant bears burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coke, Kemp, Quarles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.