Majorsky v. Douglas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding Strickland was not applied unrea- sonably when state courts found defendant had not claimed his plea was coerced
• concluding Strickland was not applied unrea- sonably when state courts found defendant had not claimed his plea was coerced
• concluding Strickland was not applied unrea- sonably when state courts found defendant had not claimed his plea was coerced
• finding counsel’s performance competent despite mixed record indicating possible coerced plea
• finding counsel’s performance competent despite mixed record indicating possible coerced plea
• “We review de novo the district court’s treatment of legal issues, and we review No. 17-2903 7 findings of fact for clear error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).