Majors v. State Accident Insurance Fund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Holding that a continuing violation is a continuous, ongoing series of discriminatory behavior and involves “unlawful employment practices that cannot be said to occur on any particular day, but occur over a series of days or years.”
• holding that the second Dixon category “is not implicated by Morgan”
• explaining that under the continuing violation doctrine, the court can consider as timely all relevant violations “including those that would otherwise be time[-]barred”
• explaining that the first category of continuing violations “cannot be said to occur on any particular day, but occur over a series of days or years”
• noting that hostile environment claims can qualify as continuing violations because they “cannot be said to occur on any particular day, but occur over a series of days or years”
• holding that Morgan has foreclosed the serial-violations theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).