Major Tours, Inc. v. Colorel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims of new plaintiffs in a civil rights action did not relate back where the initial complaint— despite including the phrase plaintiffs “and all others similarly situated”—was not otherwise plead or prosecuted as a class action
• explaining that “[t]he NJCRA was specifically amended to limit the legislation’s scope to substantive due process”
• stating that continuing violation doctrine does not apply to a racial profiling claim involving many discrete acts of racial profiling and selective enforcement in Section 1983 action.
• finding that new plaintiffs’ claims were time-barred because “nothing in the complaint suggested the identities of these later-added Plaintiffs or gave notice that they would be bringing these claims”
• noting \[t]he NJCRA was specifically amended to limit the legislation's scope to substantive due process\
• “[A] procedural due process claim cannot be brought under the NJCRA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).