Majestic Collieries Co. v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the plaintiffs’ characterizations of the actions of the defendants, police officers, as “intimidating, harassing, threatening, embarrassing, and humiliating,” without supporting factual allegations, were “conclusory” and did not state a substantive due process claim
• the plaintiffs’ characterizations of the actions of the defendants, police officers, as “intimidating, harassing, threatening, embarrassing, and humiliating,” without supporting factual allegations, were “conclusory” and did not state a substantive due process claim
• the plaintiffs’ characterizations of the actions of the defendants, police officers, as “intimidating, harassing, threatening, embarrassing, and humiliating,” without supporting factual allegations, were “conclusory” and did not state a substantive due process claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).