Skip to main content
· 12/1/2006

Majano, Mary T. v. United States

Citations

  • 469 F.3d 138
  • 373 U.S. App. D.C. 395
  • 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1376
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 29470
  • 2006 WL 3454994

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that sovereign immunity is not a bar to relief if allegedly tortious conduct occurred outside the scope of the tortfeasor’s employment
  • finding a question of fact as to whether the defendant’s physical assault of another employee was independent of her duty to report to work or within her scope of employment
  • “Scope of employment questions are governed by the law of the place where the employment relationship exists.”
  • “Scope of employment questions are governed by the law of the place where the employment relationship exists.”
  • \Scope of employment questions are governed by the law of the place where the employment relationship exists.\
  • “Scope of employment questions are governed by the law of the place where the employment relationship exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randolph, Griffith, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.