Skip to main content
· 10/24/1898

Maitland v. Greer

Citations

  • 8 Pa. Super. 461
  • 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 78

Syllabus

<p>Family relationship — Wages—Contract—Province of court and jury.</p> <p>Where a person is received into a family as a member of such family and not as a servant, as an object of charity and not as a hireling, the relation is never changed by legal implication into a relation giving a right to wages.</p> <p>When, however, there is evidence tending to show a promise to pay claimant, “for all she did,” then the question of the relation which plaintiff and defendant sustained to each other becomes a question of fact which comes within the province of the jury.</p>

Judges: Beavee, Beaver, Obxady, Poe, Porter, Ready, Reedee, Rice, Smith, Tee, Wickham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.