Maitland Bros. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• waiting for the Supreme Court’s decision in Jones was unnecessary where § 2241 petitioner could not satisfy the Seventh Circuit’s (where he filed his petition
• noting “a misclassification as a career offender does not constitute a miscarriage of justice for purposes of Davenport under an advisory Guidelines system”
• “Those familiar with our precedent will recognize these criteria as the Davenport factors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).