Maisuradze v. Nows The Time, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Fourth Amendment did not protect a conversation the defendant had with a third-party that police listened to through a wire
• noting that testi- mony from witness receiving benefits from government “may raise serious questions of credibility”
• noting that testimony from witness receiving benefits from government “may raise serious questions of credibility”
• explaining that a trespass constitutes an unreasonable search if the officer gains entry “without any express or implied consent”
• stating that “[t]his Court has long recognized the ‘serious questions of credibility’ informers pose”
• holding that “no trespass was committed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).