Skip to main content
· 1/8/1909

Maiss v. Metropolitan Amusement Ass'n

Citations

  • 146 Ill. App. 196
  • 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • radio; no ICC rule implicated
  • automatic bell ringer is an appurtenance
  • radio; no ICC rule implicated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.