Skip to main content
· 2/24/2003

Maine School Administrative District No. 35 v. Mr. & Mrs. R.

Citations

  • 321 F.3d 9
  • 2003 WL 402824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that injunctive relief was “the raison d’étre” of the school district’s suit
  • \IDEA charges school districts with making reasonable efforts both to work with parents and to satisfy the needs of special education students.... Knee-jerk compliance with a stay-put provision does not negate that responsibility.\
  • a state court habeas post-conviction process commenced beyond the 18 expiration of AEDPA’s statute of limitations does not toll or revive the limitations period under 19 section 2244(d)(1).

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Farris, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.