· 2/24/2003
Maine School Administrative District No. 35 v. Mr. & Mrs. R.
Citations
- 321 F.3d 9
- 2003 WL 402824
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that injunctive relief was “the raison d’étre” of the school district’s suit
- \IDEA charges school districts with making reasonable efforts both to work with parents and to satisfy the needs of special education students.... Knee-jerk compliance with a stay-put provision does not negate that responsibility.\
- a state court habeas post-conviction process commenced beyond the 18 expiration of AEDPA’s statute of limitations does not toll or revive the limitations period under 19 section 2244(d)(1).
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selya, Farris, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.