Maine Human Rights Commission Ex Rel. Kellman v. Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that backpay should not be reduced by the amounts of unemployment benefits that the employee received after the employer's wrongful employment action
• “ ‘[A] consistent approach to this legal question seems preferable to a virtually unreviewable discretion which may produce arbitrary and inconsistent results.’ ”
• \'[A] consistent approach to this legal question seems preferable to a virtually unreviewable discretion which may produce arbitrary and inconsistent results.'\
• \'[A] consistent approach to this legal question seems preferable to a virtually unreviewable discretion which may produce arbitrary and inconsistent results.'\
• evidence that plaintiff worked other jobs following discriminatory rejection by defendant was contrary to finding that she was not reasonably diligent in seeking other employment
• “If either the victim of the discrimination or the discriminating employer is going to receive a windfall because part of the victim’s loss has been paid for by a third party, it is more just that the windfall should inure to the injured party than to the wrongdoer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).