Skip to main content
· 4/9/1986

Maine Central Railroad v. United Transportation Union

Citations

  • 787 F.2d 780
  • 122 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that to constitute opposition an employee must reasonably believe the employer has engaged in an unlawful employment practice
  • holding employee’s opposition to radio show format change was not protected activity because he opposed the change for “personal reasons” related to his success at the radio station
  • dismissing retaliation claim based on 28 opposition to employer conduct based on personal reasons not racial discrimination
  • affirming dismissal of a retaliation claim where 12 the plaintiff did not engage in protected activity and where his complaint did not 13 concern discrimination prohibited by federal law
  • English-only order not a Title VII violation as a matter of law, but opposition based on a reasonable belief that the order was discriminatory is protected
  • English-only order not a Title VII violation as a matter of law, but opposition based on a reasonable belief that the order was discriminatory is protected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldrich, Coffin, Pettine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.