· 10/6/2004
Maindrond v. Ashcroft
Citations
- 385 F.3d 98
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20889
- 2004 WL 2240060
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Since the BIA offered two rational explanations for the denial of the motion to reopen, it has not acted arbitrarily and capriciously, and there was no abuse of discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Selya, Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.