Skip to main content
· 10/6/2004

Maindrond v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 385 F.3d 98
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20889
  • 2004 WL 2240060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Since the BIA offered two rational explanations for the denial of the motion to reopen, it has not acted arbitrarily and capriciously, and there was no abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Selya, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.