Main v. Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying reformation because, among other reasons, the plaintiff was grossly negligent in failing to read relevant transaction documents
• reformation not available because, among other things, the plaintiff was grossly negligent in failing to read relevant transaction documents
• reformation not available because, among other things, the plaintiff was grossly negligent in failing to read relevant transaction documents
• written stock certificate is considered “presumptively correct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).