Main I Ltd. Partnership v. Venture Capital Construction & Development Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting appellant’s argument that “no showing of harm or prejudice [from defect in third party notice] is required because under Arizona law a sale held without strict compliance with the notice requirements provided in the deed of trust statutes is void”
• “where the statute states that the trustee’s deed constitutes conclusive evidence of compliance with the requirements of the deed of trust statutes, this evidence cannot be rebutted.”
• “Constructive notice is neither notice nor knowledge but is a policy determination that under certain circumstances a person should be treated as if he had actual notice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).